![]() 05/09/2014 at 11:22 • Filed to: PLANELOPNIK | ![]() | ![]() |
One of the industry newsletter type things just showed up in my inbox with a blatantly incorrect headline. They are claiming that a Belgium based !!!error: Indecipherable SUB-paragraph formatting!!! . Sorry guys, but there are a ton of no tail rotor helicopters that have been flying since the 40's. The Kaman K-125 first flew in January 1947 if Wikipedia is to be believed. After the K-125 and successors, we've got the MD520N that first flew in 1989 and was certified in 1991. Beside that there is the Kamov Hokum, the Chinook, I believe every other Kaman... You think they would do 30 seconds of research before publishing something so blatantly incorrect.
!!! UNKNOWN CONTENT TYPE !!!
05/09/2014 at 11:41 |
|
Just because I love it, the HH-43:
![]() 05/09/2014 at 11:49 |
|
Kamans are just interesting. The meshing main rotors kind of freaks me out but it intrigues me at the same time.
05/09/2014 at 11:56 |
|
Yeah, I credit the Cobra Mamba I got as a kid for my love of synchropters.
![]() 05/09/2014 at 13:15 |
|
How about a Gyroplane? They aren't necessarily VTOL but they are STOL, have a rotor on top and a propeller at the front, and no tail rotor. But I'm no aircraft expert.
![]() 05/09/2014 at 13:56 |
|
Good call on the Chinook, since our aircraft, along with the CH-46, have two main rotors.
05/09/2014 at 13:57 |
|
The first helicopters (none of which had a tail rotor) predate the autogyro by about twenty years. Still, you're right, they're rotorcraft without tail rotors.
![]() 05/09/2014 at 14:15 |
|
Thanks for the info.
![]() 05/09/2014 at 15:04 |
|
For some reason I think one of those painted yellow with a smiley face on the front would look hilarious.
05/09/2014 at 15:30 |
|
Well, the Army did have a Square Dance team featuring four H-19s through 1961:
And then there was the OH-6 "Bozo the Clown"
![]() 05/09/2014 at 20:46 |
|
Hah! Hilarious!